|
Antoninus continued his journey to Syria and Egypt, and on his return to Italy through Athens he
was initiated into the Eleusinian mysteries. It was the practice of the emperor to conform to the established rites
of the age, and to perform religious ceremonies with due solemnity. We cannot conclude from this that he was a
superstitious man, though we might perhaps do so if his book did not show that he was not. But this is only one
among many instances that a ruler's public acts do not always prove his real opinions. A prudent governor will not
roughly oppose even the superstitions of his people; and though he may wish that they were wiser, he will know that
he cannot make them so by offending their prejudices.
Antoninus and his son Commodus entered Rome in triumph, perhaps for some German victories, A.D.
176. In the following year Commodus was associated with his father in the empire, and took the name of Augustus.
This year A.D. 177 is memorable in ecclesiastical history. Attalus and others were put to death at Lyon for their
adherence to the Christian religion. The evidence of this persecution is a letter preserved by Eusebius. It
contains a very particular description of the tortures inflicted on the Christians in Gallia, and it states that
while the persecution was going on, Attalus, a Christian and a Roman citizen, was loudly demanded by the populace
and brought into the amphitheatre; but the governor ordered him to be reserved, with the rest who were in prison,
until he had received instructions from the emperor. Many had been tortured before the governor thought of applying
to Antoninus. The imperial rescript, says the letter, was that the Christians should be punished, but if they would
deny their faith, they must be released. On this the work began again. The Christians who were Roman citizens were
beheaded; the rest were exposed to the wild beasts in the amphitheatre.
The war on the northern frontier appears to have been uninterrupted during the visit of Antoninus
to the East, and on his return the emperor again left Rome to oppose the barbarians. The Germanic people were
defeated in a great battle A.D. 179. During this campaign the emperor was seized with some contagious malady, of
which he died in the camp, A.D. 180 on March 17th, in the fifty-eighth year of his age. His son Commodus was with
him. The body, or the ashes probably, of the emperor were carried to Rome, and he received the honor of
deification. Those who could afford it had his statue or bust; and when Capitolinus wrote, many people still had
statues of Antoninus among the Dei Penates or household deities. He was in a manner made a saint. Commodus erected
to the memory of his father the Antonine column which is now in the Piazza Colonna at Rome. The bassi rilievi,
which are placed in a spiral line round the shaft, commemorate the victories of Antoninus over the Marcomanni and
the Quadi, and the miraculous shower of rain, which refreshed the Roman soldiers and discomfited their enemies. The
statue of Antoninus was placed on the capital of the column, but it was removed at some time unknown, and a bronze
statue of St. Paul was put in the place by Pope Sixtus the fifth.
In order to form a proper notion of the condition of the Christians under Marcus Antoninus we must
go back to Trajan's time. When the younger Pliny was governor of Bithynia, the Christians were numerous in those
parts, and the worshippers of the old religion were falling off. The temples were deserted, the festivals
neglected, and there were no purchasers of victims for sacrifice. Those who were interested in the maintenance of
the old religion thus found that their profits were in danger. Christians of both sexes and of all ages were
brought before the governor, who did not know what to do with them. He could come to no other conclusion than this,
that those who confessed to be Christians and persevered in their religion ought to be punished; if for nothing
else, for their invincible obstinacy. He found no crimes proved against the Christians, and he could only
characterize their religion as a depraved and extravagant superstition, which might be stopped if the people were
allowed the opportunity of recanting. Pliny wrote this in a letter to Trajan. He asked for the emperor's
directions, because he did not know what to do. He remarks that he had never been engaged in judicial inquiries
about the Christians, and that accordingly he did not know what to inquire about or how far to inquire and punish.
This proves that it was not a new thing to examine into a man's profession of Christianity and to punish him for
it. Trajan's rescript is extant. He approved of the governor's judgment in the matter, but he said that no search
must be made after the Christians; if a man was charged with the new religion and convicted, he must not be
punished if he affirmed that he was not a Christian and confirmed his denial by showing his reverence to the
heathen gods. He added that no notice must be taken of anonymous information, for such things were of bad example.
Trajan was a mild and sensible man; and both motives of mercy and policy probably also induced him to take as
little notice of the Christians as he could, to let them live in quiet if it were possible. Trajan's rescript is
the first legislative act of the head of the Roman state with reference to Christianity, which is known to us. It
does not appear that the Christians were further disturbed under his reign.
|